The Effectiveness of Project-Based Writing Toward Students’ Mastery of Grammatical Accuracy

  • Kunto Nurcahyoko STKIP Pamane Talino
  • Masfa Maiza
  • Antonius setiawan STKIP Pamane Talino
Keywords: Project-Based Writing, Motivation, Grammatical Accuracy

Abstract

Teaching grammar has been one of the most challenging issues in Indonesia. Teacher-centered approach and the lack of students‟ motivation are among the factors limiting students to master grammar. The study aims at investigating the effectiveness of project-based writing toward students‟ mastery of grammar based on their motivation level. The study used a 2X2 factorial research design involving 60 students in two groups in one of high schools in Landak Regency, West Kalimantan. The data were collected through test and questionnaires. SPSS 20 was used for analyzing the data. The finding reveals that project-based writing is effective toward students‟ mastery of grammar. Besides, motivation level is also effective toward students‟ grammatical accuracy. Lastly, the analysis of variance shows that there is no interaction among students‟ motivation, techniques, and students‟ grammar with the level of sig. value at 0.821. The study suggests that teachers must be able to consider the presence of both a project and motivation in teaching and learning, especially to teach grammatical accuracy.

References

Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (second edition). San Fransisco: Pearson Education.
DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning Second Language Grammar Rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379 – 410.
Dobao, F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 40–58.
George, J., & Dale, K. (1990). cooperative and collaborative learning strategies for content-area teachers”. Paper presented at the Annual Plains Regional Conference of the International Reading Association (18 th Wichita, KS, October 17-20, 1990.
Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers and students verbal behaviors during cooperative and small-group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (2), 271– 287.
Horan, C., Lavaroni, C.. & Beldon, P. (1996). Observation of the Tinker Tech Program students for critical thinking and social participation behaviors. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
Ivone, F. (2005). Teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia: The urge to improve classroom vocabulary instruction. TEFLIN Journal, 16(2), 195-208
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N.(2006). How language are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Ljung, E. J., & Blackwell, M. (1996). Project OMEGA: A winning approach for at-risk teens. Illinois School Research and Development Jounal, 33, 15-17
Pintrich, P.R.,& Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pusat Kurikulum. (2013). Kajian Standar Proses Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 82-94.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, (26), 207-231.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286–305.
Shepherd, H. G. (1998). The probe method: A problem-based learning models effect on critical thinking skills of fourth- and fifth- grade social studies students. Dissertation Abstract International, Section A: Humanity and Social Sciences, September 1988. 59 (3-A), p. 0779.
Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30 (3), 510–532.
Skinner, E.A., & Belmont, M.J (1993). Motivation in the Classroom; Reciprocal effect of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School Year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50 (2), 315–342.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process and students‟ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(2), 153–173.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners‟ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334.
Swain, M. (2001). Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(3), 44–63.
Thomas, J.W (2000). A Review of research on project-based learning. California: The Autodesk Foundation.
Thomas, J. W. & Mergendoller, J. R. (2000). Managing project-based learning: Principles from the field. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Winkel, F. W. (2006). Peer Support Groups: Evaluating the mere contact / mere sharing model and some impairment hypotheses. Victimology: International Perspectives, 2(1), 101-114.
Published
2018-12-11
How to Cite
Nurcahyoko, K., Maiza, M., & setiawan, A. (2018). The Effectiveness of Project-Based Writing Toward Students’ Mastery of Grammatical Accuracy. Journal of English Language Teaching and Islamic Integration (JELTII), 2(01), 87 - 100. Retrieved from http://e-journal.hikmahuniversity.ac.id/index.php/jeltii/article/view/126